News, analysis and personal reflections on the markets & the financial sector
Showing posts with label solar energy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label solar energy. Show all posts

Friday, September 17, 2010

Solarfun Proves Why Investors Like Chinese Panels

(Bloomberg) -- Solarfun Power Holdings Co. is proving that cheaper, Chinese goods branded with English- sounding names can make renewable-energy investors rich.

The Chinese company makes solar panels that cost 35 percent less than Germany’s Schott AG and is headed to double sales in 2010. Its shares jumped 73 percent this quarter and lead Chinese stocks that are set to take the top five slots on the Bloomberg Global Leaders Solar Index for the first time in five quarters.
Solarfun, beating 499 of the 500 members in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index, and Chinese makers of raw materials for panels like LDK Solar Co. gained an edge over German and U.S. rivals by mid-year. That’s when new energy and fiscal policies in Europe drove solar park developers to seek lower-cost panels to protect profit. Even after the gains, the Chinese stocks remain less expensive than Western counterparts in price-earnings terms.
“The Chinese are the ones to beat,” said Olaf Koester, head of renewable energy at VCH Investment Group, which oversees about 130 million euros ($165 million) including Chinese panel maker Trina Solar Ltd., up 62 percent this quarter. Their panels, or modules, are about 20 percent cheaper on average than those from German makers such as Conergy AG or Schott, he said in a telephone interview from his office in Frankfurt.
China’s manufacturers of panels and the polysilicon main ingredient have benefited from more than $20 billion in government loans this year while Western companies mainly seek private financing.
Long-Term ‘Winners?’
“In the long-term, the Chinese will probably be the winners,” said James Britland, an analyst at Allianz RCM, which oversees about $2 billion in assets, including Asian polysilicon producers. “The real driver is their lower pricing.”
The five best performers on the 38-member Bloomberg solar index include China’s JA Solar Holdings Co. and Renesola Ltd. The group trades at an average 8.3 times expected 2010 earnings. That’s below the index average of 29 times earnings and the 27 times earnings ratio of online travel agency Priceline.com Inc., the best-performing S&P 500 stock in the quarter, up 88 percent.
“All these Chinese manufacturers have very low multiples and all look to be pretty good value for what are essentially growth stocks,” said Matthew Page, who manages about $45 million in alternative-energy shares at Guinness Atkinson Asset Management in London, including shares in Trina Solar.
The Chinese manufacturers are riding the crest of a doubling of worldwide panel orders this year, having curbed production costs while improving quality to gain market share, said Martin Simonek, an analyst in London at Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
Less-Expensive Panel
A Solarfun polycrystalline panel with a 195-watt capacity costs 396.27 euros compared with 610.47 euros for a similar module made by Schott, including taxes, according to the Solar Fachhandel website that sells solar-power generating products.
China’s companies have newer production equipment than German competitors like Solarworld AG and Q-Cells SE and have “very cheap” access to capital for expansion, Simonek said.
State-run China Development Bank agreed to provide more than $20 billion loans to Trina, JA Solar, Yingli Green Energy Holding Co. and Jiangsu-based Suntech Power Holdings Co. Solarfun, also from Jiangsu, in July secured $1 billion from Bank of China and $885 million from the Bank of Shanghai.
Meantime, Western competitors have struggled to cut production costs and reverse a shrinking market share. Hamburg- based Conergy on Aug. 3 reported its first quarterly profit after 14 losses and has wrestled with financing for expansion.
“We have to work on lowering prices to better compete with the Chinese,” said Alexander Leinhos, a spokesman for Conergy.
Panel Price Importance
Panel prices became more crucial for solar park builders after Germany, the world’s biggest market for panel sales, lowered the premium prices, or “feed-in tariffs,” that consumers pay for solar power by 16 percent in July.
“Once the Germans started cutting the feed-in tariffs, that put a lot of pressure on pricing,” said Allianz RCM’s Britland. “With cheaper, high-quality Chinese panels you can still earn good returns.”
Chinese panel makers will boost their global market share to 60 percent this year because of their “low-cost structure,” Paul Combs, a Solarfun vice president, said in a telephone interview from Shanghai. He said Solarfun may more than double shipments to 700 to 750 megawatts from 300 megawatts in 2009.
Even with lower rates in Germany, companies will still install 9 gigawatts worth of solar equipment there this year, exceeding the U.S. by about 10 times, as developers rush to build before rates may be cut again, according to New Energy Finance estimates.
Officials at LDK Solar, Renesola, JA Solar and Trina didn’t return telephone calls for comment.
Currency Effect
China’s panels have become even cheaper for Europeans as the yuan fell almost 6 percent on the euro in the quarter, helped by the European currency rallying after Spain and Greece cut budgets. The euro’s drop in the first half depressed Chinese profits from European sales, fund manager Thiemo Lang said.
The Chinese in the previous quarter “were hit very hard by the weakness of the euro,” said Lang, the best-performing manager in New Energy Finance’s 2009 ranking of 41 funds that invest in clean-energy stocks. “The weakness of the euro was correlated with the weakness of the market.”

Saturday, December 19, 2009

BP Solar to dismantle addition

(Source: The Frederick News-Post)By Ed Waters Jr., The Frederick News-Post, Md.
Dec. 18--Next spring, motorists passing the BP Solar building on Solar Court will once again see workmen busy on the 140,000-square-foot addition to the original structure.

But this time, the crews will be dismantling the addition, not completing it.

Pete Resler, manager of external communications for BP Solar, said Thursday afternoon that the addition will be taken apart and the materials recycled.

"It was not an easy decision," he said, but the global company had not been able to find someone to buy or lease the addition.

The company broke ground for the addition in 2007, a $100 million project that would have added manufacturing equipment and hire about 70 additional workers. But the marketfor solar panels has become highly competitive and BP Solar had to cut back. After $30 million of the project was completed, BP Solar decided to halt construction and try to sell or lease the area.

Dismantling was the most cost-effective alternative, Resler said. He couldn't quote a cost, but said the contractor who will do the work will recycle the materials and the overall cost will be lower.

Resler expects the work to start in the first quarter of 2010. He did not know how long it would take to dismantle the addition. "There won't be wrecking balls there. It will be done carefully to recycle the materials."

The deconstruction won't affect operations at the BP Solar plant, now used for research and development and downsized manufacturing. In March, the company laid off 140 employees. While some of the initial phases of solar panel construction are still performed by the plant's 400 employees, the panels are completed in Poland, China and India.

Delegate Sue Hecht has been working to get $2 million in state stimulus funds and an $11 million federal tax credit for BP Solar. Hecht said Thursday the money would help the company move all of its research and development efforts worldwide to Frederick .

"The site where the addition is would become a solar array. The company would be able to do on-site testing," Hecht said.

The company would use the funds to develop a new line of solar panels. While initial construction of those panels would be done in Frederick , the final phase would be outsourced, Hecht said.

"I see that as a wonderful opportunity," Hecht said. A "first cut" in the federal review could come soon, she said, while the state decision wouldn't be until spring.

"If we are not able to move forward on this, the Frederick site will continue to become a 'cost' site for BP Solar, rather than a profit site," she said.

"I don't want to see something happen there as it did with Eastalco, when we lost 600 jobs that didn't come back."
But Frederick County Commissioner John L. Thompson Jr. considers use of taxpayer fundsfor businesses "corporate welfare." He opposes the "handouts" and notes a 2008 report from the Securities and Exchange Commission showing $367 billion in total revenue, and $228 billion in assets for BP PLC, parent company of the solar energy firm.

"Whether or not they tear down a building on their property, that is a business decision," Thompson said. "If BP Solar wants to build something there, let them go to the capital market, borrow the money and pay it back."

"Where are the teabaggers?" Thompson said, referring to activists opposing what they see as excessive federal spending and deficits. "The government doesn't have the money, especially the federal government. It is just running the presses to print money."

Thompson criticized elected officials who say they are against growing deficits, but have a different view when it concerns their own area. "That's inconsistent," he said.

Laurie Boyer, director of the county's economic development office, said Thursday she was disappointed that the expansion plan didn't move forward. "We are working with them on the site. We know the company is committed to Frederick and will retain employees."

Richard Griffin, the city's economic development director, noted the tough solar energy market, but was optimistic about the company. "We are incredibly bullish on BP Solar and hope it will become a great R&D center."

-----

To see more of the Frederick News-Post or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to http://www.fredericknewspost.com.