Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Bear Managers’ Acquittal May Hamper U.S. Fraud Prosecutions

A federal jury acquitted two former Bear Stearns hedge fund managers of defrauding investors. Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin were found not guilty on all charges of conspiracy, securities fraud and wire fraud. They were accused of deliberately misleading investors before the financial crisis. "There wasn't enough evidence ... The e-mails went both ways," jury forewoman Jenny McCaughey said. Legal experts said the verdict might make prosecutors more hesitant about bringing charges against Wall Street managers who lost large sums in the financial crisis.

more at http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5A94RW20091111

Former Bear Stearns hedge-fund manager Matthew Tannin smiles after being acquitted of fraud charges at U.S. District Court in Brooklyn, November 10, 2009.

Wall Street's big three set to pay $30bn in bonuses

Three of Wall Street's biggest firms, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Chase and JPMorgan Chase, will be paying out bonuses worth close to $30 billion this year, according to analysts' estimates.

The three companies, who have all left the Troubled Asset Relief Program, are expected to be paying out a collective $29.7 billion to their employees, a 60 per cent increase on figures for 2008.

Almost 120,000 people are employed by the companies, so the average payout will be more than $250,000.

Bloomberg analysts believe that cash payments will be deferred in favor of stock options as the Wall Street giants come under regulatory pressure to match bonus pay more closely to performance.

But the likes of Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase are still likely to face a public outcry over the reported figures.

Paul Hodgson, a senior research associate on compensation at the Corporate Library, told Bloomberg: "It doesn't seem as if even political threat, disastrous PR, envy, rising unemployment rates and home repossessions is enough to get any of these people to refuse the bonuses they have 'earned'."

Goldman Sachs will reportedly pay out $21.9 billion in bonuses after a record-breaking year, with Morgan Stanley handing out more than $15 billion.

And JPMorgan Chase is preparing to pay out $12 billion to its investment bankers, according to estimates.

Compensation consultancy Johnson Associates has recently predicted that average bonuses on Wall Street are going to rise by 40 per cent this year, with those working in recovering sectors such as equities in line for a 60 per cent increase in the size of their bonus payouts.

Earlier this week, Goldman Sachs chief executive Lloyd Blankfein claimed that bankers were doing "God's work."

"We help companies to grow by helping them to raise capital. Companies that grow create wealth," he told the Sunday Times.

"This, in turn, allows people to have jobs that create more growth and more wealth. We have a social purpose."

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Roth IRA conversions -- the 2010 rule

In retirement, your paycheck might go away, but taxes won't.
Still your tax bill can be hard to predict. To have some control over how much you pay the government each year, you should have both taxable and non-taxable accounts from which to draw your retirement income.

Imagine it this way. Perhaps early in retirement you choose to continue to work part time and supplement your income from retirement savings accounts. The combined income may put you into a higher tax bracket. However, if you take some money from a Roth IRA that year, because withdrawals are nontaxable, it could help keep you in the lower bracket.

In later years if you're not working and hitting the next highest tax bracket isn't an issue, you can pull more money from a traditional IRA or 401(k) account.

This type of tax diversification is one of the primary reasons people choose to put some of their money in a Roth IRA, or convert to such an account.

"It affords you the flexibility when the time comes to make a withdrawal from an account that lines up best with your current taxes," said Chris McDermott, a senior vice president at Fidelity Investments.

Thanks to a new rule that goes into effect in January, more people can convert assets from a traditional IRA or a 401(k) account, at a former employer, into a Roth IRA.

As of Jan. 1, people making more than $100,000 may convert to a Roth IRA. Previously, only people who earned less than $100,000 could convert.

Here's a look at who should consider converting and why.

Q: What are the benefits of converting from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA?

A: One advantage is that you'll be paying taxes on the account balance now, so that when you need to spend it once you're retired, you won't have to pay taxes. In addition, the money in the Roth IRA is growing tax-free. An investor converting a $100,000 account could see the account grow by $40,000 more in 20 years due to the tax advantage, compared with an unconverted traditional IRA, for example.

Another benefit of a Roth IRA is that you do not have to withdraw the money. Unlike a traditional IRA where you have to begin making withdrawals at age 70 1/2, you can let the Roth account continue to grow because you've already paid taxes. That can be critical now that people are living much longer due to health advances.

__

Q: What are some of the things I should think about when considering whether to convert?

A: You should have enough money in other savings accounts to pay the income taxes you'll incur on the amount you want to convert. You don't want to pay the taxes out of your IRA because it reduces the amount that will go to work for you compounding tax free. One thing to consider is converting only the portion on which you can comfortably pay taxes.

Also, make sure the amount you're converting doesn't put you in a higher tax bracket. The amount you pull out of the IRA or 401(k) to convert will add to your taxable income for the year. To avoid that problem, consider converting some now and some in subsequent years. Another option is to take advantage of an IRS rule for 2010 that allows you to recognize the conversion income over the 2011 and 2012 tax years. This means that you can spread out the tax bill that arises from converting your account.

Also, keep in mind that you should only convert an account balance that you won't need to access for at least five years. Withdrawing the money from the Roth IRA within five years before you're 59½ will result in a 10 percent penalty.

Fidelity last week rolled out a new calculator to help people determine whether to do a Roth conversion. It can be found at: https://calcsuite.fidelity.com/rothconveval/app/launchPage.htm.

___

Q: What is the change next year regarding Roth IRA conversions for higher income earners?

A: As of Jan. 1, 2010, people making more than $100,000 may convert an IRA account to a Roth IRA. Previously, only people who earned less than $100,000 could convert.

A recent survey by Charles Schwab & Co. Inc. indicates education is needed to inform people about the advantages of a Roth conversion. The September telephone survey of 400 people with incomes above $100,000 found more than 60 percent were unaware of the change in Roth conversion rules and more than a third said they were unsure of the general benefits of a Roth IRA versus a traditional IRA. More than 70 percent said they were not planning to do a conversion, but a similar amount said they'd consult with a financial adviser. The survey had a statistical margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 percent.

Seeking advice of a tax expert or financial adviser is a good idea regardless of income to see if converting all or part of a traditional IRA to a Roth would be beneficial.

___

Q: What if I do a conversion and my account balance falls due to a market downturn or I decide I made a mistake?

A: You actually get a do-over. The rules regarding Roth IRA conversions permit you to undo the conversion and put the money back. If you do a conversion in 2010, for example, you have until Oct. 15, 2011, to reverse it in a process the government calls a recharacterization, said Stacy McDowell, a senior manager at online brokerage E-Trade Financial Corp. The primary reason a reversal might be sought is if the account value falls significantly after the conversion.

So for instance if you convert an IRA worth $150,000, and it's value drops to $100,000, you can recharacterize the account and not pay the taxes due on the conversion or you can get a refund if you've already paid Uncle Sam. You won't regain what you've lost in the stock market, but you won't be paying taxes on money you no longer have.

Lloyds to Cut 5,000 Jobs

LONDON -- Lloyds Banking Group PLC said Tuesday it plans to cut 5,000 jobs at its group operations, insurance and retail divisions to help eliminate overlap following its acquisition of HBOS earlier this year.

The move means Lloyds is on track in meeting its target of £1.5 billion ($2.51 billion) in cost savings from merging HBOS and Lloyds, a spokesman said.

It adds to worsening unemployment in the U.K. financial services industry and comes just a week after HSBC Holdings PLC said it will cut 1,700 jobs in the U.K.

Monday, November 9, 2009

This Day in Wall Street History 1903: A rich man's panic

The Panic of 1903 reached its nadir -- the Dow dropped to a paltry 42.15 as the stocks of industrial companies plunged to single-digit lows.

Also known as the "Rich Man's Panic," the fiscal crisis dragged on for the rest of the year, taking a severe toll on banks, as well as many steel and iron producers.

Source: History.com

John Reed : I'm Sorry I Ever Built Citigroup

John S. Reed, who helped engineer the merger that created Citigroup Inc., apologized for his role in building a company that has taken $45 billion in direct U.S. aid and said banks that big should be divided into separate parts.

“I’m sorry,” Reed, 70, said in an interview yesterday. “These are people I love and care about. You could imagine emotionally it’s not easy to see what’s happened.”

Citigroup was formed in 1998 when Citicorp, a commercial bank, combined with Sanford I. Weill’s Travelers Group Inc., which owned the investment firm Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc. The New York-based company lost $27.7 billion in 2008 and took $118 billion in writedowns. Now 34 percent-owned by the Treasury Department, Citigroup sought help in the wake of a credit freeze that claimed three of Wall Street’s biggest firms and led to the deepest recession in 70 years.

Congress’ overhaul of U.S. financial regulations should include ordering banks to hold more capital, ensuring executives’ compensation is aligned with long-term profitability and banning firms that take deposits from also engaging in equities and fixed-income trading, Reed said.

“I would compartmentalize the industry for the same reason you compartmentalize ships,” Reed said in the interview in his office on Park Avenue in New York. “If you have a leak, the leak doesn’t spread and sink the whole vessel. So generally speaking you’d have consumer banking separate from trading bonds and equity.”

Glass-Steagall Repeal
Lawmakers were wrong to repeal the Depression-era Glass- Steagall Act in 1999, Reed said. At the time, he supported overturn of the law, which required the separation of institutions that engaged in traditional customer banking services from those involved in capital markets.

Reed’s Compensation
From 1997 to 1999, Reed received salary and bonuses totaling $23.4 million, according to Citigroup filings. In 2000, he received a retirement bonus of $5 million, filings show. Citigroup provides him with an assistant and a New York office, for which he pays taxes, he said

The third-largest U.S. bank, Citigroup shed about $300 billion in assets, or 13 percent of its total, in the third quarter and is selling what it calls non-core properties, according to regulatory filings. The company said yesterday that it will spi off its Primerica Financial Services subsidiary.

CEO Vikram S. Pandit has eliminated about 100,000 jobs since late 2007, reducing the headcount by 26 percent as of Sept. 30.

Citigroup pioneered the production of collateralized debt obligations, bundles of loans whose cash flows were sold to investors. When subprime mortgage borrowers began defaulting on payments in 2007, the CDOs lost value and became part of Citigroup’s $118 billion in writedowns and credit losses.

In the last year, the bank received $45 billion from the U.S. government to bolster its capital and another $300 billion in loss guarantees. The Treasury Department retained its 34 percent stake after converting a portion of the $45 billion in rescue funds to equity.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/11/06/2009-11-06_bank_merger_man_john_reed_im_sorry_i_ever_built_citigroup.html

U.S. criticizes U.K. proposal to tax financial transactions

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner voiced disapproval with a proposal from U.K. Prime Minister Gordon Brown for a tax on financial transactions. Geithner said he would not support the tax but appeared to soften his stance later, saying the International Monetary Fund would be responsible for coming up with possibilities. "We want to make sure that we don't put the taxpayer in a position of having to absorb the costs of a crisis in the future," Geithner said. "I'm sure the IMF will come up with some proposals."

The Russian finance minister, Alexei Kudrin, also said he was skeptical of such a tax. Similar fees had been proposed by Germany and France but rejected by Mr. Brown’s government in the past as too difficult to manage. But Mr. Brown is now suggesting “an insurance fee to reflect systemic risk or a resolution fund or contingent capital arrangements or a global financial transaction levy.”

Supporters of a tax had argued that it would reduce the volatility of markets; opponents said it would be too complex to enact across borders and could create huge imbalances. Mr. Brown said any such tax would have to be applied universally.